Review & Evaluation Process

  1. Home
  2. Review & Evaluation Process

Publication Process — 4 Steps

1) Initial Screening

Each submitted paper is checked for the following fundamentals:

  • Relevance to conference theme
  • Quality of content and writing
  • Plagiarism similarity percentage
  • Compliance with layout/formatting guidelines

Possible decisions:

  • Pass – forwarded to scientific/technical committee; reviewers assigned.
  • Resubmission Required – email with improvement instructions is sent.
  • Rejection – email notification of non-acceptance.
2) Review’s Decision

After peer review, one of the following outcomes is communicated:

  • Acceptance – email with publication, registration, invitation, and accommodation details.
  • Revision Required – email with modification instructions.
  • Rejection – email notification of non-acceptance.
3) Reviewer Criteria
  • Practical relevance
  • Suitability for the conference
  • Adequate issue analysis
  • Novelty and organization of content
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Overall originality and robustness
4) Finalization
  • Authors complete registration and submit camera-ready files.
  • Editorial checks for ethics, formatting, and metadata.
  • Papers scheduled for presentation and queued for proceedings/partner journals.